Especially if you have large provinces like France, with much industries. Hopefully we get some good information here.Ĭonstitutional Monarchy are preferable in the later part of the game for the reason you say. I've had plenty as the Dutch.Īnyway, tell me what you think, and why. I've never had a revolution as GB or even been able to engineer one. I can tell you from experience, Great Britain's populace is much friendlier to my government. Tell me who you think has less rowdy people. Just play a game as Great Britain and another as the Dutch. Therefore, with the absence of industrialization and (to a smaller extent) government officials' attributes, the CM produces happier citizens than any other form of government, even Rs. The middle class, on the other hand, automatically has higher happiness than the nobility, and there are very few negative public order attributes toward the middle class. This means *POOF!* negative public order to the lower class from industrialization or government officials' attributes are gone! What you now have is a nobility with (usually) increased happiness from its government officials, and little reason to rebel. If you look at the public order icons, you will notice that the two major classes in a CM are the nobility and the middle class, but no lower class. On the surface, Rs look the best because they have the highest bonuses to public order, do they not? Well, first we need to dig deeper. The government with the best control of its population is arguably CM. By simply getting rid of bad candidates and waiting for good ones to come along, a tyrannical absolutist king can, over time, produce a cabinet with fine and able administrators that always meet his satisfaction. The most able form of government is undoubtedly AM. This, then, combines the efficiency of an AM with the public interest (or res publica) of an R. Therefore, the people can't do anything about the king, but he does not have arbitrary control over the people, and therefore, while people may not be entirely satisfied with their ruler, they are content with his leadership. What is does not have is a tyrant, nor a politician limited to public opinion. It has the stability and consistency of AMs, as well as the constant change of policy and inconsistency in the people's favor from Rs. It is simply a combination of certain aspects within AMs and Rs. Out of these three government types, which is most efficient, has the most able government, and best controls its citizens and conquered subjects?īelow, I will give the reasons why I believe that the limited monarchy system of government is the most efficient, and while not the most able form of government, it best controls its citizens even better than Republics.įirst of all, we must define CM. With DMUC, +1 public order to middle class, +4 public order to lower class. With vanilla E:TW, +2 public order to middle class, +4 public order to lower class. Republic (R): Head of state elected along with cabinet to a 5-year term (10 turns), or until fired (head of state cannot fire himself >. With DMUC, +3 public order to nobility, -2 public order to middle class. With vanilla E:TW, +1 public order to nobility, +1 public order to middle class. Cabinet members elected to 5-year term (10 turns), or until fired (only usable once per turn). With DMUC, +4 public order to nobility, -6 public order to lower class.Ĭonstitutional Monarchy (CM): Hereditary ruler. With vanilla E:TW, +2 public order to nobility, -2 public order to lower class. Cabinet members for life, or until replaced by king. Absolute Monarchy (AM): Hereditary ruler.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |